• Home
  • About the book
  • About the author

MADE IN AMERICA

Notes on American life from American history.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Opening Day, 2018: Politics, Race, and Baseball
Loneliness Scare Again… and Again… and… »

Where Have You Gone, “Alienation”?

April 19, 2018 by Claude Fischer

In a recent web essay, the eminent historian (and my Berkeley colleague) Martin Jay raised this question: Why has the term “alienation,” which was the all-purpose diagnosis of social and personal ills a generation or so ago, seemed to wane in public discourse? “Why aren’t we ‘alienated’ anymore?,” Jay asks. So does historian David Steigerwald in a 2011 piece cited by Jay.

The question immediately resonated. Circa 1975, inspired in part by my teacher, Melvin Seeman, I had written articles with “alienation” in the titles, taught a seminar on the topic, passed around an alienation reading list, and generally joined that conversation. Now, forty years later, hardly at all. Yes, what did happen to “alienation”?

Alien_Hopper_The Automat_1927

Hopper, The Automat, 1927

Before trying to answer that question, however, we need to make sure that diagnosing “alienation” has in fact ended. If it has, we then need to figure out whether the conditions labeled “alienation” have diminished or just uses of the particular word have.

It turns out that academics have largely dropped  “alienation” as a topic, but high-brow writers are still deploying it, although much less often. That these fluctuations say something about changing life in America is less likely than that they are saying something about changing fashions among the intelligentsia.

What is “Alienation”?

“Alienation” is one of those blanket–no, big, blue, roof tarp–words that can be stretched to cover a vast array of conditions, none of them, except perhaps artistic inspiration, good. People who are angry, withdrawn, fatalistic, rebellious, criminal, radical, and so on are often described as “alienated.” Lengthy books have been written to define the notion more theoretically and precisely, but I’ll be briefer.

“Alienation” is, in many of its versions, both an objective state of being and a subjective response to that condition, the condition of being separated from something essential, something such as the quality of being human, God, Nature, a person’s “true” character, the culture, or the community. In some renderings, everyone in a certain place or time (except, often, the author) is alienated. We today, for example, may be alienated by modern technology, capitalism, or the science’s “disenchantment” of the world.

The young Karl Marx developed the most important version of this argument. The essence of being human, our “species-being,” he argued, is free, creative, labor. Capitalism forces people to work for survival under others’ control, doing regimented and repetitive work, and thus alienates workers from their humanity. Only after the revolution will people be made whole again.

In some versions of the concept, being objectively alienated leads people to feel separated and to express that feeling in ways such as depression, unease, distrust, hostility, or self-doubt. In other versions, however, feelings of alienation are suppressed by internal forces like self-delusion or by external ones like “bread and circuses.” Then, alienation is revealed only in individuals’ subtle, perhaps unconscious, behavior (for example, spending extravagantly or seeking escapist entertainment).

A sprawling idea, indeed, alienation.

Has “Alienation” Gone?

Both Jay and Steigerwald evidence their case that “alienation” has gone into eclipse largely by comparing the intellectual debates and pop cultures of the 1950s and 1960s, when “alienation” was a “talismanic term” (Jay) and “the paradigmatic explanation for social behavior” (Steigerwald), to those of today, when it seems absent. Jay, in addition, uses Google’s Ngram program of word-counts from centuries of books to find that mentions of “‘alienation’ [were] rising spectacularly [in English-language books] from 1958 to its height in 1974. But since then it … dropped like a stone.”

Detecting themes and trends in cultural products like fiction and film is difficult and controversial. The word counts are, however, semi-hard data, shedding light at least on the use of language. So, I revisited Google’s Ngram and I also looked at “alienation” in other sources, as described in footnote[1].

The take-aways are: (a) Social scientists and historians of America almost never addressed “alienation” before 1960. They then flocked to the topic, with their attention peaking in the 1970s. After that, they steadily and almost completely walked away from it. (b) In high-brow publications and books, authors’ mentions of “alienation” zoomed up from out of nowhere in the 1960s and ‘70s and then declined–but declined not as much as academics’ use did. Their invocation of alienation” persisted into 2010 at about half the rate of the 1970s. “Alienation” is, albeit diminished, still with us.

We can push the word-count analysis yet further: From what are people described as alienated in different decades?

One can count phrases, not just words, in Google Ngrams. The phrases “alienated/tion from labor/work,” the classic Marxist version, rose and fell rapidly, mentions growing ten-fold from the 1950s to the ’70s and then shrinking ten-fold to 2008 (the end of the Google series).[2] “Alienated/tion from others/people” also rose about 10-fold from about 1950 to the ‘70s, but these phrases remained frequent through through the mid-’90s, and then sank by only about a fourth to 2008. Mentions of “alienated from his/her/their body(ies)” rose rapidly to peak in the 1980s and ‘90s and declined halfway back by 2008. As a final example, references to “alienated/tion from God” slowly but steadily increased since 1940 and continued to increase in the 2000s.

One implication of this exercise is that “alienation’s” popularity seems to depend on the specific topics to which the term is applied rather than reflecting one holistic concept. Another implication is an endorsement of both Jay’s and Steigerwald’s sense that authors’ concerns about labor, work, and class have waned while their concerns about more cultural issues–like community, the body, and faith–have persisted.

Stepping back again to the big picture, let us ask, as Jay and Steigerwald did, why discussion of “alienation” as a whole dropped by about half after the 1970s–especially when it would seem that experiencing a state of alienation did not decline and may have increased as average Americans’ economic fortunes stagnated, as they increasingly expressed distrust of other people,[3] and as their politics grew increasingly bitter.

But we should first try to explain the even more dramatic rise in the mentions of  “alienation” after the 1950s.

Explaining Rise and Fall

Before the 1960s, writing about “alienation” was rare among social scientists and authors generally. (Both Jay and Steigerwald seem to misremember the 1950s as an alienation-full decade; it was not.[4]) By the mid-1970s, “alienation” references had grown by an order of magnitude. Why?

Did the underlying rates of experienced alienation, however it is defined, soar after the 1950s? Probably not. However, young folks’ cultural and political protests against mainstream American society did grow. Perhaps the growing alienation literature reflected all those complaints. (Steigerwald cites Mario Savio’s 1964 speech about stopping “the machine.”) A simpler and, to me, more plausible explanation is that an intellectual fashion arrived from Europe during the 1940s and ‘50s, planted itself here, and blossomed in the ’60s and ‘70s. Jay describes the landing of European refugee scholars such as Erich Fromm and how their ideas and their words flourished in American soil. Thus, literary terms emerge and rise and shape the discourse–as in the word “discourse” itself.[5]

Next, why did “alienation” talk drop out in academia and drop substantially in the high-brow media after the 1970s and ’80s? Jay raises several possibilities: “Was it fatigue with a concept whose explanatory power and emotional charge had been spent? Was it the realization that other, unrelated sources of oppression were yet to be vanquished? Or had alienation become a self-indulgent luxury, now that living standards were not necessarily rising from one generation to the next?” In the end, Jay focuses mainly on intellectual trends, discussing figures like Foucault and Brecht.[6] Steigerwald argues that “… as both a paradigmatic way of explaining ourselves to ourselves and as a tangible social-psychological difficulty, alienation has mostly evaporated.” The reason it has mostly evaporated, he goes on, is the rise of a consumerist culture that induces distraction, passivity, and false bliss (an argument, by the way, that has been made for at least a century[7]).

Simplifying the issue: Is the explanation for the fall of interest, one, that the condition of being “alienated” has become less common in post ‘70s America? Or is it, two, that authors’ use of “alienation” theories to understand people has become less common? Or is it, three, that the use of the specific word “alienation” has gone out of fashion and it has been replaced by other words pointing to the same conditions?

Google Ngram data suggest that the third explanation, word substitution, is unlikely. Synonyms for “alienation” show roughly the same rise and fall as the word itself.[8] The first explanation, that Americans have become actually less alienated in its various meanings, also seems improbable. Subjectively, answers to survey questions that would seem to measure feelings of alienation don’t show notable improvement since the 1970s and ’80s.[9] Objectively, conditions that might be described as alienating or as revealing alienation–say, chronic joblessness, social isolation, addiction–have either not changed much or changed in different ways.

The second explanation seems the best bet: That the academic and more broadly intellectual fashion of applying alienation ideas to a wide variety of problematic conditions, objective and subjective, has faded since its 1970s heyday. Perhaps authors have focused instead on more specific concerns–say, community solidarity or emotional depression–than on a broad malaise. Or perhaps, they have been attracted to other topical issues, like sexual identity and diversity. (Those perhapses will have to be answered another day.)

In any case, the history of “alienation” testifies to the way ideas cycle in public discourse for reasons that have more to do with the world of commentary than with the lived world.

 

———————-Notes————————–

[1] Because the volume of publications and of vocabulary rose over the years, I turned counts into ratios as available in the indices. In academic writing, there appears to have been a rapid rise and rapid fall of attention to “alienation.”

(1) The proportion of sociological articles–broadly defined–using the term in either title or abstract was essentially nil in 1950s, rose to 15 per one thousand articles in the 1970s, and then dropped to 2 per thousand in the 2010s. (This is based on Sociological Abstracts and is measured as the ratio of articles with titles or abstracts including “alienation” to articles with titles or abstracts including “the.”)

(2) The proportion of American history articles–also broadly defined–using the word “alienation” anywhere in the text went from 3 per thousand articles in the 1950s to 12 in the 1960s, 7 in the 1970s, and down to under 3 since 2000. (This is based on the America: History and Life database and is the ratio of article texts using “alienation” to those using “American.”)

In general intellectual writing, “alienation” rose rapidly, but it did not plummet back to its original low level. I looked at three specific databases.

(1) The New York Times: In the 1950s, 0.6 articles per thousand articles used the term; in the 1960s, 4.2 did; in the 1970s, 6.6 did; in the 2000s, 5.6; and in the 2010s, 6.3. (This is a ratio of articles with “alienation” to those with the word “the.”)

(2) In The Nation during the 1950s 10 per thousand articles had “alienation” in them, rising to 46 in the 1970s, falling to about 33 in the 1980s and ‘90s; and about 25 since 2000. (The denominator is articles with “American” in them.)

(3) The New Yorker’s online archive to which I had access does not seems complete, but includes a rapidly growing absolute number of articles with “alienation.”

Google’s Ngram viewer tells us about books. First, a clarification: Ngram does not present word counts; its result is the percentage of all words (or n-word phrases) in a year’s worth of books that are the word (or n-word phrase) in question. Second, it is a rich but tricky tool. My procedure: (a) I looked at the American English corpus, 1940-2008 (Google’s end year). (b) I combined the terms “alienation” and “alienated.” The result is the figure below.  (By the way, if one looks at British rather than American books, the upswing is similar, but the decline has been notably less. Also, if one removes English Fiction results from total English results, the general pattern remains.)

Alienation+Alienated_5yr
[2] The phrases (“alienated from labor” + “alienation from work” + “alienated from labor” + “alienated from work”) were effectively absent in American books before 1945, went up ten-fold between 1955 and 1975, and dropped ten-fold by 2008 (a five-year moving average).
[3] The General Social Survey has long asked Americans “Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you can’t be too careful in life?” The percentage picking the second option has steadily increased from 53% in the 1970s to 64% in the 2010s.
[4] To many cultural analysts the 1950s was the alienated decade of The Lonely Crowd (1950) and Catcher in the Rye (1951). But “alienation” hardly appears in The Lonely Crowd’s first edition–not in the book’s index and not really in its text; Riesman used the word in its current sense perhaps once. In Riesman’s introduction to the 1969 edition, however, he used it several times and in its current meaning. It is no surprise that the word does not appear in The Catcher in the Rye (nor does alienated or even alien).
[5] Google ngrams shows that “discourse’s” representation in books slowly dropped by over 90% between 1805 and 1920. It rapidly re-emerged in the 1980s, roughly tripling in 20 years.
[6] Jay also points to a rise in anxiety about actual “aliens.”
[7] See chapter on “Goods” in my book, Made in America.
[8] Isolation, estrangement (multiplied ten-fold for visibility), indifference, disaffection (times 10), loneliness, anomie (times 10), with alienation for comparison:

Alienation Synonyms
[9] In the General Social Survey, self-descriptions as “unhappy,” or dissatisfied with family life or friendships, or views of most people as not trustworthy have changed little from the 1970s to the 2010s (to the 1990s for family and friends). Trends in expressions of loneliness in other data have been flat (see Fischer, Still Connected, and this recent post by David Weakliem). Meanwhile, hostility around politics has clearly increased.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged alienation, intellectuals, vocabulary |

  • Made in America: Now available in Paperback, on Kindle, and via Google eBook

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 448 other subscribers
  • Comment Back to:

    madeinamericathebook @ gmail.com
  • * 2010 winner, PROSE Award for U.S. History, American Association of Publishers.
    * "A shrewd, generous, convincing interpretation of American life" -- Publishers Weekly
    * "Masterful and rewarding . . . exactly the sort of grand and controversial narrative, exactly the bold test of old assumptions, that is needed to keep the study of American history alive and honest" -- Molly Worthen, New Republic Online
    * "... brave and ambitious new book ...." "Made in America sheds abundant light on the American past and helps us to understand how we arrived at our own historical moment, and who we are today." -- David M. Kennedy, Boston Review
    * "... this book ... already belongs to the prestigious line of works which decipher the singular character of America. It is in itself a mine of definitive information for all those who are interested in American society and its fate in modernity" [trans. from the French] -- Nicolas Duvoux, Sociologie

  • Pages

    • About the book
      • Corrections & Updates
    • About the author
  • Previous Posts

    • How Red v. Blue Became Me v. You: Polarization, Part I
    • The Covid Experience Reveals How Weird America Is
    • Americans Continue to Associate. For What Cause?
    • Slavery, Capitalism, and Reparations
    • Opening Day, 2022: Still Unresolved
    • No Peace, No Justice
    • The Right’s Reaction to Americans’ Leftward Shift: A Supreme Example
    • The Culture Has Moved Left… So the Right has Mobilized
    • Overcoming Distance and Embracing Place: Personal Ties in the Age of Persistent and Pervasive Communication
    • The Death Surge Before Covid-19: Who, What, and Why.
    • Women Rising: Life Stories from the Last Century
    • Whither Big Tech, or When Novelties Become (Regulated) Necessities
    • Opening Day, 2021: Baseball’s Crises
    • First Takes on the Election #2: What About the Polls?
    • The Political Census
    • First Takes on the Election: #1, What Happened?
    • Now for Something Different: Is Sex Wilting?
    • Explaining Trump: The Next-to-Last Time (I Hope)
    • Covid-19: Exceptionalism with a Vengeance
    • Is Left Cancel Culture Cancelling Left Culture?
    • BLM Protests: Surprisingly Successful… So Far. Why?
    • White Liberals’ Political Correctness Could Help Trump Get Re-Elected
    • Asteroidal Change or Glacial Change? Peering Over the Covid-19 Horizon
    • Opening Day Under Covid-19: Do Fans Matter?
    • COVID-19: Balancing Short-Term Solutions and Long-Term Effects. Are There Lessons from 1918?
    • Bernie: The Left is Still Waiting for the Proletariat Vote
    • AG Barr says attacks on religion are loosening the hounds of hell. Are they?
    • One Year Down, One to Go: Still Explaining Trump
    • Lead, Brains, and Behavior: Sociology Meets Biology
    • The Year’s Racial Flare-Ups: Signs of the Future or Signs of a Last Gasp?
    • [Bracket] Political Commentary [End Bracket]
    • Parental Love, Opportunity Markets, and Inequality
    • Brain Twisting, or How We Evolved
    • Opening Day, 2019: Data-Crunching, Inequality, and Baseball
    • Fixing Inequality: More Opportunity is Not the Answer
    • A Christian America? The Talk and the Walk
    • Shareholder Value: Law, Inequality, and the Doubting Justice
    • After the Election: More Polarization or Less?
    • Searching for the Authentic Self (… and Finding Trump)
    • The Politics-Religion Vortex Spins
    • Loneliness Epidemic: An End to the Story?
    • Get by with a Little Help from…
    • Feel-Good or Do-Good Politics
    • Do Americans Tolerate Zero Tolerance?
    • How Can Size of Community Still Matter?
    • Sending a Message by Pollster
    • Loneliness Scare Again… and Again… and…
    • Where Have You Gone, “Alienation”?
    • Opening Day, 2018: Politics, Race, and Baseball
    • Local Cultures
    • Chain Migration
    • Explaining Trump Some More
    • “Okie from Muskogee” a Half-Century On
    • Reversing American Voluntarism
    • National Character? A Reply to Stearns
    • Do We (Still) Value Family?
    • Is Marriage Over? For Whom?
    • Bannon, Brown, and the Identity Debate
    • The Great “American” (or is it New York?) Songbook
    • Is Health Care a Right?
    • Church Social
    • Inequality is about Security and Opportunity
    • Democracy in America, France, and “Hamilton”
    • Opening Day, 2017: Inequality on the Field, in the Stands
    • Voting for the Five Percent
    • More (on) Polarization
    • Americans and the Unassimilables
    • Explaining Trump
    • ***** Hiatus *****
    • The Great Settling Down
    • Election Reflection
    • Is the U.S. No Longer Religiously Exceptional?
    • Technology and Housework: Other Tasks for Mother?
    • Can Sociability Blunt Political Polarization?
    • The End of Good Work?
    • RFD, Media, and Democracy
    • Long Tails, Big Cities, Critical Masses
    • A Woman President?
    • Magazines: 19th Century Internet
    • Friends and “FB Friends”
    • Reversal of Fortune: American Cities
    • Does Education Work?
    • A Tony by Any Other Name…
    • Bernie, Hillary, and Historical Memory
    • Driving Cattle, Driving Exceptionalism
    • Build Bigger Wall? Get More Undocumented.
    • Opening Day 2016
    • Great Again
    • A Celebrity Strong Man
    • Survey Says . . .
    • Veterans and Suicides?
    • Odd Man In
    • The Pace, the Pace
    • A Street Divided
    • A History of Health and Health Inequalities
    • Why Diversity
    • Family Wages
    • What Happened When They Came?
    • The Grandma (and pa) Effect
    • Turkle, Times, Technology, Trauma–Yet Again
    • Just Deserts
    • Cell Phone Etiquette
    • Changing Hearts, Changing Matters, 2011-2015
    • American Self-Creation
    • The Immigrant-Crime Connection
    • Black by Choice?
    • The Marriage Contract
    • Attaining Adulthood
    • Left Out: Working-Class Kids
    • Life is a Stage, or Several
    • Family Farms vs. Americanism
    • Censor This, Political Correctness
    • Opening Day 2015
    • Science vs. Religion… or Science and Religion?
    • Building the Natural Market
    • Dressing Down
    • Untangling the Race Gap
    • Finding Public Relief
    • Surveying Change
    • Snap Decisions and Race
    • Holy-Day Exceptionalism
    • Where Does the “Don’t Shoot” Movement Go?
    • Reporting from America’s “Slums”
    • Racism as Mental Illness?
    • Which University?
    • The “Shared” Economy
    • Of Places Past
    • Long Story of the “Long Tail”
    • The Blameless Only
    • When Epidemic Hysteria Made Sense
    • Latest News on “No Religion”
    • Vocabulary Retrogression
    • American Way-Differentism: More a Club than a Family
    • Do Ideas Matter?
    • Alternative to Empathy
    • Women Dining
    • Too Much Social Science?
    • Ferguson and Social Media
    • Blame Who or What
    • “Libertarianism is Strange” Revisited
    • All Tech Is Social
    • How Ideas Make Themselves Matter
    • Women in Politics 1780-2014
    • Government Works
    • Telling Stories vs. Telling Data
    • Persistence of Race, 2014
    • Selfishness or Self-Awareness?
    • Virtuous Debt
    • Work Hours and the Pay Gap
    • Life in Public, Then and Now
    • Mourning 9/11 Victorian Style
    • A “Friends” Gripe
    • Bible Readings
    • Old Days, Fast Times
    • De-Democratizing?
    • Eco-Puritanism
    • Bring Me Your….
    • Thinking Inequality
    • Which Radical Ideas Come True?
    • Pastime – Opening Day 2014
    • Where Did “Hispanics” Come From?
    • Kitty Genovese: The Emblematic Story
    • Public Health
    • Exceptionalism Ending?
    • Risk-Sharing
    • Folktales of the Policy Elites
    • Male (Job) Insecurity
    • Libertarianism is Very Strange
    • Art and the Machined World
    • The Public Housing Experiment
    • The S-Curve of Cultural Change
    • Artful History
    • Inventing the Social Network
    • American Dream, Twisting
    • Deservingness
    • Place Matters More
    • Squirrely History
    • Atheist Evangelism: “Nothing New Under the Sun”
    • The Giving Season… and Era
    • Cell Phone Science
    • Boo! Americans and the Occult
    • You Call That a Shutdown?
    • More Inequality Updates
    • Political Responses to the Crash
    • Child Labors
    • Word Counts and What Counts
    • Loss of Economic Exceptionalism
    • Learning Sympathy
    • Respecting the Science
    • Economic Equality, 1774 and Beyond
    • Declaring You’re a “None”
    • Extremely Local
    • Robert Bellah
    • Inequality Hits Home
    • The Supreme Court Ducks Immutability
    • Postcard from Paris
    • America’s Religious Market
    • American-Made Ethnic-Americans
    • New Media and Old Manifestations
    • Novel Data: Promise and Perils
    • Immigrants and Historical Amnesia
    • Inequality Update
    • Psychologically Damaged
    • Race in the Eye of the Beholder
    • Getting Smarter
    • Suicide Boom?
    • Tweedledee-Tweedledum Nostalgia
    • Sexual License, Sexual Limits
    • Markets, Prices, and Justice
    • Immigration and Political Clout
    • Is the Gender Revolution Over?
    • Writerly Baseball – Opening Day 2013
    • Back Home
    • Catholic Schism
    • How Material Are We?
    • Unholy Alliance: Laissez Faire and the Church
    • The ’60s Turn 50
    • The Left’s Religion Problem
    • Paying Attention to the Kids
    • We’re # Last!
    • Risk Taking
    • The Elderly and Their Children
    • Guns
    • A Modern “Antebellum Puzzle”?
    • Makes One Anxious
    • Psychological Labeling … and Enabling?
    • The Giving Nation? Philanthropy’s Problems
    • Religion, Politics, and the Sunday Mail
    • The Happiness Boom
    • What Americans Have Been Thinking
    • The Verdict on Class and Voting
    • Panderocracy
    • 9/11 Reaction and Resilience
    • A Cost of Inequality: Growth
    • Obama’s Racial Penalty
    • Choose Your Choice
    • To the Poorhouse
    • The Polarizing Political Paradox Redux
    • The 47% Charge in U.S. History
    • The Survey Crisis
    • Competitive Intelligence
    • Execution Songs
    • Spiritual and/or Religious
    • “Who Built That?”: Chance and History
    • Meeting, Mating, and the Web
    • Live Long and Prosper — and Plan
    • Voting Violence
    • Sex and the American Car
    • The Assets Gap
    • Differences Under the Differences
    • Why Americans Don’t Vacation
    • Virtuous Voting
    • Clothes Make the Common Man
    • Driving Blind
    • Geography of Inequality
    • Slavery’s Heavy Hand
    • Gay Vows
    • Explaining Poverty (Again)
    • Out- and Insourcing
    • Still Under God
    • The Loneliness Scare is Back
    • Sunday Pleasures, Private Faith
    • Between Dole and Market
    • Opening Day 2012 – Worldwide
    • Tolerating Americans
    • What’s the Common in the Common Good?
    • End Times and Presidents
    • The Abortion Puzzle
    • The Army of Black Liberation
    • The South Has Risen
    • Can’t Believe It
    • Marrying — Up, Down, Sideways
    • Occupy 2012: Another 1968?
    • Over-Impacted
    • How Bad is “European”?
    • Unique, Sovereign, American
    • The Working Class’s Party
    • Reconstructing Memory
    • Make-Your-Own Religion
    • Consume This
    • Self-Absorbed: Emerson & Thoreau
    • What Works? Votes.
    • Stumbling in the Dark
    • More on Occupy
    • Occupy! Now What?
    • Lost Children
    • Cheerful Yanks?
    • Tolerating Ambiguity
    • New News, Old News
    • Unequal Denial
    • Timing is (Not?) Everything
    • Breastfeeding History
    • What’s a Life Worth?
    • Homesick Blues
    • Summer Break
    • Spinsters No More
    • Missing Tramps
    • City Crime; Country Crime
    • Living Togetherness
    • Naturally Clean
    • Women Graduating
    • Home Owning Dreams
    • Technology and Fundamentals
    • Protected Class
    • Faith Endures
    • American Exceptionalism
    • Buying a Head Start
    • A. Lincoln, Socialist?
    • Opening Day 2011
    • Shaken but Secure
    • Jobs Go and Come
    • Heavy Hand
    • The Big Change
    • American Ties (III)
    • Money and Character
    • Going Out–or Home?
    • Degree Inequality
    • American Ties (II)
    • Ugly or Needy
    • 18th-Century Twitterfeed
    • American Ties (I)
    • Grammar Rules
    • Christmas Struggle
    • Ancestor Worship
    • Was Slavery, Is Slavery
    • Hanukkah or Vanish?
    • Pilgrims, Puritans, Americans?
    • Return on Investment
    • Solidarity, Soldiers, and Baseball
    • Win Stay, Lose Change
    • Why Vote?
    • We’re All Geniuses
    • Caring More or Less
    • Life Begins
    • Equal Visions
    • No Dinner Invitations?
    • Depressing Comparisons
    • Labor’s Laboring Efforts
    • Multiculturalism Lite and Right
    • Who Has Your Back
    • A Natural Romance
    • Alone or Lonely?
    • Sentimental Journey
    • LeBron & the 10th
    • We’re #1 !
    • A Fragmenting America? – Pt. 2
    • A Fragmenting America? – Pt. 1
    • Fighting for the 4th
    • Gentrified Memories
    • Juneteenth: Race? Slavery?
    • Boomer Blues
    • No Longer the Tall American
    • A Crime Puzzle
    • Memorial-izing Day
    • Angry Old White Men
    • Sisters Take the Streets
    • Brooks, Policy, and History
    • Tongue-Tied to America
    • Happiness Happy
    • Inventing Friendship
    • American Individualism – Really?
    • Tax Day: The Government-Enterprise System
    • Opening Day 2010
    • Did “Consumerism” Blow Up the Economy?
    • A Christian America? What History Shows
    • The Myth that Never Moves
    • Good Health, Long Life, and Big Government
    • Announcing the “Made in America” Site

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • MADE IN AMERICA
    • Join 448 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADE IN AMERICA
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: